Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A Theory of Judicial Deference
In many instances, appellate courts defer to lower courts and administrative agencies; the appellate court allows the other agent’s decision to stand even though the appellate court has strong reason to believe that decision incorrect. We provide a model in which such deference is rational. Our model is set in a two-dimensional case space. One dimension reflects "global" facts that are known to...
متن کاملThe Role of Judicial Procedure Courts in the Development of Iranian Administrative Law
Today, in leading administrative law systems, the judicial process along with the law is the most important source of legal rules, and the law alone can not feed the legal system. Although in the administrative law system of Iran, the use of judicial procedure has often been considered as a source and interpretation of the law and not as the main source, but the role of administrative courts, ...
متن کاملprincipeles and criteria of administrative judicial review in switzerland law
principles of judicial review in administrative law are basic criteria developed through judicial decisions. most of these principles have a legal value in modern administrative law. in this paper some of these principles and criteria have been studied in switzerland administrative law. in this country the legality, equality, public interest, good faith, hearing and proportionality principles h...
متن کاملAdministrative Management, Administrative Regulation and the Judicial Process
In discussing problems connected with what is called public administration and administrative law, confusion not infrequently results from a failure to understand at the outset what is meant by the term "administration". A distinguished authority 1 has described administration as essentially the process of translating the general into the particular, and, as one phase of this process, the task ...
متن کاملAn OWL ontology library representing judicial interpretations
The article introduces JudO, an OWL2 ontology library of legal knowledge that relies on the metadata contained in judicial documents. JudO represents the interpretations performed by a judge while conducting legal reasoning towards the adjudication of a case. To the aim of this application, judicial interpretation is intended in the restricted sense of the acts of judicial subsumption performed...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Duke Law Journal
سال: 1989
ISSN: 0012-7086
DOI: 10.2307/1372576